ether.fi Cash vs PST.NET
Head-to-head on the facts that decide your money - fee stacks, KYC, the bitcoin flow and limits.
Short answer: ether.fi Cash wins overall (6.4/10 vs 4.4/10). The right pick still depends on your priority - see the flow comparison below.
 ether.fi Cash |  PST.NET | |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 6.4 | 4.4 |
| BTC load | Direct BTC top-up (on-chain) | Direct BTC top-up (on-chain) |
| BTC sale timing | Not documented | Not documented |
| KYC | Full KYC | Full KYC |
| Custody | Self-custody | Custodial |
| Top-up fee | 0% | not documented |
| FX fee | 1% | 1% |
| Monthly fee | none | ? |
| Cashback | 3% in ETHFI | none |
| Regions | US, UK, EEA, APAC, LATAM | GLOBAL |
Pick ether.fi Cash if
- Higher documented cashback (3% vs 0)
- Wider documented availability
Pick PST.NET if
- you match none of ether.fi Cash's edge cases - the closer score makes it the default
ether.fi Cash
A genuinely different architecture: keep full self-custody of 250+ assets and spend through a credit line instead of selling - with tiered memberships, travel cashback and premium Visa perks. The risks are equally clear: borrowing costs, portfolio volatility/liquidation risk, and a protection program that was still 'not yet live' at review time.
PST.NET
A niche virtual-card service for online/media-buying use cases with crypto funding - usable for its purpose, but tier subscriptions, per-card fees and the niche positioning make it a poor general spending card.