PST.NET vs Xapo Bank
Head-to-head on the facts that decide your money - fee stacks, KYC, the bitcoin flow and limits.
Short answer Xapo Bank wins overall (5.6/10 vs 4.4/10). The right pick still depends on your priority - see the flow comparison below.
| Bitcoin flow | ||
|---|---|---|
| BTC load | Direct BTC top-up (on-chain) | Direct BTC top-up (on-chain) |
| Lightning funding | no | no |
| BTC sale timing | Not documented | Not documented |
| Fees | ||
| Top-up fee | not documented | 0% |
| FX fee | 1% | 0% |
| Monthly fee | not documented | $83.33 |
| ATM fee | not documented | 2% |
| Cashback | none | none |
| Privacy & custody | ||
| KYC | Full KYC | Full KYC |
| Custody | Custodial | Custodial |
| Limits | ||
| Daily spend limit | not documented | USD 50,000/day in-store and USD 50,000/day online; temporary raises up to USD 750,000 case-by-case via support |
| ATM daily limit | not documented | USD 2,000/day |
| Max load | not documented | not documented |
| Availability | ||
| Regions | GLOBAL | GLOBAL |
| Network | Visa | ? |
| Form factor | Virtual | Physical + virtual |
| Apple Pay | no / unknown | no / unknown |
Pick PST.NET if
- Known fee stack (1.0 vs 16.7 % equivalents on a $500/mo profile)
Pick Xapo Bank if
- Physical card option
PST.NET
A niche virtual-card service for online/media-buying use cases with crypto funding - usable for its purpose, but tier subscriptions, per-card fees and the niche positioning make it a poor general spending card.
Xapo Bank
The only true bank in the comparison: a Gibraltar credit institution with deposit-insured USD, savings interest paid daily in BTC and worldwide card spending with no FX fees. The $1,000/year membership makes it a wealth product, not a spending card - it pays off for balances where the 3.35% yield outruns the fee.
More head-to-heads
FAQ
Which is better for privacy, PST.NET or Xapo Bank?
When does my bitcoin get sold on each card?
Which is cheaper overall?
Facts checked 2026-10-05 · How we verify